Chat GPT Usually gives guidance to people, but in an extraordinary situation, AI Chatboat has wrongly accused a Norwegian citizen of killing two of his children.
In this way the person lodged a complaint against AI chatting software.
Foreign news reports that a Norwegian citizen, Arvi Hajelmer Holman, filed a lawsuit Chat GPT His notoriety.
According to the report, Chat GPT claimed that the man had killed two of his children.
Yet another bullying Ai Chat boot encourages teenager to kill parents.
Media accounts say that Arvi Hajelmer had asked Chat GPT with some questions. Ai Chatboat replied that he was a Norwegian resident, who killed two of his boys, aged 10 and 7, in December 2020, in the Norwegian city of Trundhim.
The Chatboat also said that he was imprisoned for 21 years for the crime and that his sons found suicide in a pond in his home.
The report added that when looking for the wrong content about yourself, Arvi Hajelmer Holman contacted the Norwegian data protection authority and argued that Chat GPT information was high and that European data privacy rules were violated.
A Norwegian citizen has requested to pay a fine for inventing an open chat boat.
Openi to launch anti -disinfection tools before poles in dozens of countries
Earlier, the Chattagat -maker Openi has said that it will introduce Tools Tools to fight against the notoriety in the country this year before dozens of elections, which are the home of half of the world’s population.
The explosive success of text generator Chat GPT promoted the revolution of global artificial intelligence, but it also mobilized warnings that such tools could disperse the Internet and flood through voters.
With this year’s elections in countries, including the United States, India and the United Kingdom, the Open said Monday that it would not allow its Tech-Chat and GPT to be used for political campaigns, including GPT and image generator Dale E3.
“We want to make sure that our technology has not been used in a way that can weaken,” Open said in a blog post.
He added, “We are still working to understand how effective our tools can be to convince personal nature.”
“Unless we know much, we do not allow people to make applications for political campaigns and lobbying.
